Police in Baton Rouge say they have arrested three people who stole guns with the goal of killing police officers. They are still looking for a fourth suspect in the alleged plot, NPR's Greg Allen reports.

"Police say the thefts were at a Baton Rouge pawn shop early Saturday morning," Greg says. "One person was arrested at the scene. Since then, two others have been arrested and six of the eight stolen handguns have been recovered. Police are still looking for one other man."

A 13-year-old boy is among those arrested, Greg says.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

After an international tribunal invalidated Beijing's claims to the South China Sea, Chinese authorities have declared in no uncertain terms that they will be ignoring the ruling.

The Philippines brought the case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, objecting to China's claims to maritime rights in the disputed waters. The tribunal agreed that China had no legal authority to claim the waters, and was infringing on the sovereign rights of the Philippines.

Donald Trump is firing back at Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg after she made disparaging comments about him in several media interviews. He tweeted late Tuesday that she "has embarrassed all" with her "very dumb" comments about the candidate. Trump ended his tweet with "Her mind is shot - resign!":

Donald Trump wrapped up his public tryout of potential vice presidential candidates in Indiana Tuesday night with Gov. Mike Pence giving the final audition.

The Indiana governor's stock as Trump's possible running mate is believed to be on the rise, with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich also atop the list. Sources tell NPR the presumptive GOP presidential nominee is close to making a decision, which he's widely expected to announce by Friday.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

The unassuming hero of Jonas Karlsson's clever, Kafkaesque parable is the opposite of a malcontent. Despite scant education, a limited social life, and no prospects for success as it is usually defined, he's that rarity, a most happy fella with an amazing ability to content himself with very little. But one day, returning to his barebones flat from his dead-end, part-time job at a video store, he finds an astronomical bill from an entity called W.R.D. He assumes it's a scam. Actually, it is more sinister-- and it forces him to take a good hard look at his life and values.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Donald Trump picked a military town — Virginia Beach, Va. — to give a speech Monday on how he would go about overhauling the Department of Veterans Affairs if elected.

He blamed the Obama administration for a string of scandals at the VA during the past two years, and claimed that his rival, Hillary Clinton, has downplayed the problems and won't fix them.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Pages

After The U.S. Leaves, Who Pays For Afghan Forces?

Apr 17, 2012
Originally published on April 17, 2012 5:14 am

This week, NATO Cabinet ministers, including U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, will try to tackle the problem of Afghan security. The basic plan for bringing American troops home from Afghanistan is to let Afghan security forces fight for their own country. But there's a hitch — finding a way to pay for the Afghan army.

Right now, the Afghan national security forces are growing, and will surpass 350,000 troops and police later this year. For the West, that's the idea — once those troops are well trained, Western forces can leave. But someone will have to pay the multibillion-dollar cost of keeping those Afghan forces in arms.

"How long do you project that we Americans are going to have to bear most of the cost of paying for the Afghan security forces?" Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, asked top Pentagon officials at a recent hearing. "Are we talking about 10 years, or 20 years?"

James Miller, acting undersecretary for defense, basically shrugged. He admitted it would be a long time before Afghanistan can afford to pay that bill. And over the next couple of years, the budget shortfall will grow — because the Western commitment to pay for the bigger Afghan security force is already beginning to shrink. Anthony Cordesman at the Center for Strategic and International Studies says that over the next year alone, the U.S. share drops by nearly half.

"What that really tells you is we don't have a plan," Cordesman says. "We have a set of goals, and they're being dictated as much by budget pressures and the knowledge we're leaving as anything else."

Like Cordesman, many politicians in the U.S. and Afghanistan are worried the declining financial commitment means Afghan forces could face an impossible task after 2014 — that's a critical year, because it's when Western nations plan to hand over security to Afghanistan.

At a news conference in Kabul last week, NATO leader Anders Fogh Rasmussen told Afghan President Hamid Karzai, in effect, that NATO would keep Afghanistan safe for the long term.

"The whole international community committed itself to help finance the Afghan security forces also beyond 2014," Cordesman says.

There's one way to bridge the gap between promises to keep Afghanistan secure and the desire to cut expenses: The U.S. needs other NATO countries to help pick up more of the tab.

"About $1.3 billion of that they would like to see coming from foreign donors, and then another $500 million coming from the Afghan government," says Nora Bensahel with the Center for a New American Security, explaining U.S. spending goals.

But like diners facing a big dinner bill, the U.S. and NATO are waiting to see who grabs the check first. The U.S. would like to see all of this ironed out before the next big NATO meeting in Chicago in May. But Cordesman says there's no sign other countries will step up.

"Because they haven't been spending it when this war had a far higher priority in U.S. eyes, and far more public support than it has today," Cordesman says.

With Europe facing economic turmoil, and public support for the war on the decline in the U.S., there's no political gain to being first in line to pay for Afghan defense. The U.S. is simply hoping that the costs of security will get cheaper. Bensahel says the U.S. figures the Afghan army can shrink after 2014.

"The administration has explicitly said that it can plan to bring down those numbers, and therefore pay less money, because it assumes there's reconciliation with the Taliban by that point," Bensahel says.

If there's no peace settlement and a big Afghan fighting force is still needed, expenses will remain high. With so much still unknown about the future of Afghanistan, it's no wonder NATO seems to be deferring decisions about funding until later.

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

LYNN NEARY, HOST:

Here's the basic plan for bringing American troops home from Afghanistan: Build up Afghan security forces so they can defend their own country. But there's this hitch: how to pay for the Afghan Army. This week in Brussels, NATO Cabinet ministers, including U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, will try to tackle that problem. NPR's Larry Abramson has this report.

LARRY ABRAMSON, BYLINE: Right now, the Afghan National Security Forces are growing and will surpass 350,000 troops and police later this year. For the west, that's the idea - once those troops are well trained, most western forces can leave. But someone will have to pay the multi-billion dollar cost of keeping those Afghan forces in arms. Republican Senator Susan Collins asked top Pentagon officials about this at a recent hearing.

SENATOR SUSAN COLLINS: How long do you project that we Americans are going to have to bear most of the costs of paying for the Afghan security forces? Are we talking about 10 years or 20 years?

ABRAMSON: Acting Pentagon Undersecretary James Miller basically shrugged. He admitted it will be a long time before Afghanistan can afford to pay that bill. And over the next couple of years, the budget shortfall will grow, because the Western commitment to pay for this bigger Afghan security force is already beginning to shrink. Anthony Cordesman, at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, says, over the next year alone the U.S. share drops by nearly half.

ANTHONY CORDESMAN: And what that really tells you is we don't have a plan. We have a set of goals and they're being dictated as much by budget pressures and the knowledge we're leaving, as anything else.

ABRAMSON: Like Cordesman, many politicians in the U.S. and Afghanistan are worried the declining financial commitment means Afghan forces could face an impossible task after 2014. That's a critical year because it's when Western nations plan to hand over security to Afghanistan.

There's one way to bridge the gap between promises to keep Afghanistan secure and the desire to cut expenses: the U.S. needs other NATO countries to pick up more of the tab. Nora Bensahel with the Center for a New American Security, says the U.S. wants to divide up costs like this.

DR. NORA BENSAHEL: That about $1.3 billion of that, they would like to see coming from foreign donors, and then another 500 million coming from the Afghan government.

ABRAMSON: But like diners facing a big dinner bill, the U.S. and NATO are waiting to see who grabs the check first. The U.S. would like to see all this ironed out before the next big NATO meeting in Chicago in May. But Anthony Cordesman says there's no sign other countries will step up.

CORDESMAN: Because they haven't been spending it when this war had a far higher priority in U.S. eyes, and far more public support than it has today.

ABRAMSON: With Europe facing economic turmoil and public support for the war on the decline here in the U.S., there's no political gain to being first in line to pay for Afghan defense. The U.S. is simply hoping that the costs of security will get cheaper. Nora Bensahel says the U.S. figures the Afghan army can shrink after 2014.

BENSAHEL: The administration has explicitly said that it can plan to bring down those numbers, and therefore pay less money, because it assumes that there's reconciliation with the Taliban by that point.

CORDESMAN: If there's no peace settlement and a big Afghan fighting force is still needed, expenses will remain high. With so much unknown about the future of Afghanistan, it's no wonder NATO seems to be saying, let's think about the money tomorrow.

ABRAMSON: Larry Abramson, NPR News.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

NEARY: This is NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.