NPR Politics presents the Lunchbox List: our favorite campaign news and stories curated from NPR and around the Web in digestible bites (100 words or less!). Look for it every weekday afternoon from now until the conventions.

Convention Countdown

The Republican National Convention is in 4 days in Cleveland.

The Democratic National Convention is in 11 days in Philadelphia.

NASA has released the first picture of Jupiter taken since the Juno spacecraft went into orbit around the planet on July 4.

The picture was taken on July 10. Juno was 2.7 million miles from Jupiter at the time. The color image shows some of the atmospheric features of the planet, including the giant red spot. You can also see three of Jupiter's moons in the picture: Io, Europa and Ganymede.

The Senate is set to approve a bill intended to change the way police and health care workers treat people struggling with opioid addictions.

My husband and I once took great pleasure in preparing meals from scratch. We made pizza dough and sauce. We baked bread. We churned ice cream.

Then we became parents.

Now there are some weeks when pre-chopped veggies and a rotisserie chicken are the only things between us and five nights of Chipotle.

Parents are busy. For some of us, figuring out how to get dinner on the table is a daily struggle. So I reached out to food experts, parents and nutritionists for help. Here is some of their (and my) best advice for making weeknight meals happen.

"O Canada," the national anthem of our neighbors up north, comes in two official versions — English and French. They share a melody, but differ in meaning.

Let the record show: neither version of those lyrics contains the phrase "all lives matter."

But at the 2016 All-Star Game, the song got an unexpected edit.

At Petco Park in San Diego, one member of the Canadian singing group The Tenors — by himself, according to the other members of the group — revised the anthem.

School's out, and a lot of parents are getting through the long summer days with extra helpings of digital devices.

How should we feel about that?

Police in Baton Rouge say they have arrested three people who stole guns with the goal of killing police officers. They are still looking for a fourth suspect in the alleged plot, NPR's Greg Allen reports.

"Police say the thefts were at a Baton Rouge pawn shop early Saturday morning," Greg says. "One person was arrested at the scene. Since then, two others have been arrested and six of the eight stolen handguns have been recovered. Police are still looking for one other man."

A 13-year-old boy is among those arrested, Greg says.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

After an international tribunal invalidated Beijing's claims to the South China Sea, Chinese authorities have declared in no uncertain terms that they will be ignoring the ruling.

The Philippines brought the case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, objecting to China's claims to maritime rights in the disputed waters. The tribunal agreed that China had no legal authority to claim the waters and was infringing on the sovereign rights of the Philippines.

Donald Trump is firing back at Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg after she disparaged him in several media interviews. He tweeted late Tuesday that she "has embarrassed all" with her "very dumb political statements" about the candidate. Trump ended his tweet with "Her mind is shot - resign!":

Pages

Jury To Decide Apple's Patent Case Against Samsung

Aug 22, 2012
Originally published on August 22, 2012 4:10 pm

What your next smart phone or tablet computer might look like is in the hands of a California jury. In one of the biggest patent infringement cases ever, Apple is suing Samsung — charging that in creating its products, Samsung ripped off iPhone and iPad technology. Samsung countered with its own allegations.

This case is complex, the legal issues are daunting, and the jury's decision has to be unanimous.

"What's at stake here is the future of smartphones and the tablet market," says intellectual property expert Christopher V. Carani.

He notes that the patents being debated cover both design and how things work. The jurors will be given a verdict form with about 700 questions, and they're supposed to decide if any of about three-dozen devices made by Apple or Samsung infringe on patents owned by the other company.

Carani says comparing each product to all of the patents will be difficult.

"For each one, they'll have to have an itemized determination regarding infringement," Carani says, "then moving to invalidity — in other words, whether or not the patents were valid or invalid. And then if there is a finding of liability, they'll have to go to each one of the asserted products and products and determine what level of damages were incurred.

The judge in the case worries that the jury will be "seriously confused."

Apple maintains that if you look at Samsung's tablets and its smartphones, it's clear the South Korean company shamelessly copied Apples design and some of its technology. Apple is seeking billions in damages and wants Samsung — the largest maker of Android phones — to stop selling copycat devices in the U.S.

But the real impact of this case, one The Wall Street Journal has dubbed the patent trial of the century, could go well beyond these two companies.

"If Apple prevails, then all of these competitors will be sent back to the drawing board to say, 'We have to produce our own innovations, our own ways of doing things,' and that will produce more diversity in the market," says analyst Charles Golvin of Forrester Research.

On the other hand, he says, if Samsung wins, you can expect a lot more products that look like Apple's.

It's always difficult to predict the outcome in a complex jury trial, but Stanford law professor Mark Lemley has some ideas.

"One of the interesting things has been how much Samsung seems to have been on the defensive," he says.

Though Samsung has claims against Apple, much of the case focused on Apple's assertion that Samsung was the bad guy. Lemley says Samsung spent a lot time trying to limit the amount of money it might have to pay.

"Going into the jury verdict, this sure looks like a case where Apple has the edge in terms of momentum and how the jury is likely to be feeling," Lemley says.

The jury begins deliberations Wednesday, and with hundreds of questions to be answered, it's impossible to say how long it might take.

Earlier this year, jurors took about a week to decide a patent dispute involving Google and Oracle. But in another patent dispute, a jury took only about an hour to award Monsanto a billion dollars.

Whatever the jury decides in the Apple-Samsung case, the verdict is likely to be appealed.

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

It's MORNING EDITION from NPR News. Good morning. I'm David Greene.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

And I'm Steve Inskeep.

A decision by a California jury may affect what your next smartphone or computer looks like, or at least who has the right to make it. Apple is suing Samsung for as much as $2.75 billion, a huge case. And Apple says Samsung ripped off iPhone and iPad technology. Samsung has countered with its own allegations. To say this case is complicated is an understatement, as we hear from NPR's Wendy Kaufman.

WENDY KAUFMAN, BYLINE: This case is complex, the legal issues are daunting and the jury's decision has to be unanimous.

CHRISTOPHER V CARANI: What's at stake here is the future of smartphones and the tablet market.

KAUFMAN: That's intellectual property expert Christopher V. Carani. He notes the patents being debated cover both design and how things work, and offers this preview of the task facing the jurors. They'll be given a verdict form with about 700 questions and they're supposed to decide if any of about three dozen devices made by Apple or Samsung infringe on patents owned by the other company. Carani says comparing each product to all the patents will be difficult, but just listen to what else the jury has to do.

CARANI: For each one they'll have to have an itemized determination regarding infringement, then moving to invalidity, in other words whether or not the patents were valid or invalid. And then if there is a finding of liability, they'll have to go to each one of the asserted products and determine what level of damages were incurred.

KAUFMAN: Got all that? Well, the judge herself worries that the jury will be, quote, "seriously confused." Apple maintains that if you look at Samsung's tablets and its smart phones, it's clear the South Korean company shamelessly copied Apple's design and some of its technology.

Apple is seeking billions in damages and wants Samsung, the largest maker of Android phones, to stop selling copycat devices in the U.S. But the real impact of this case, one The Wall Street Journal has dubbed the patent trial of the century, goes well beyond these two companies. Here's analyst Charles Golvin of Forrester Research.

CHARLES GOLVIN: If Apple prevails, then all of these competitors will be sent back to the drawing board to say we have to produce our own innovations, our own ways of doing things, and that will produce more diversity in the market.

KAUFMAN: On the other hand, he says, if Samsung wins, you can expect even more products that look a lot like Apple's. It's always difficult to predict the outcome in a complex jury trial. But Stanford law professor Mark Lemley has some ideas.

MARK LEMLEY: One of the interesting things about the case has been how much Samsung seems to have been on the defensive.

KAUFMAN: He says though Samsung has claims against Apple, much of the case focused on Apples assertion that Samsung was the bad guy. Indeed, Lemley says, Samsung spent a lot time trying to limit the amount of money it might have to pay.

LEMLEY: And so I think going into the jury verdict this sure looks like a case where Apple has the edge in terms of momentum and how the jury's likely to be feeling.

KAUFMAN: The jury of seven men and two women begins deliberations today. And with hundreds of questions to be answered, it's impossible to say how long it might take. Earlier this year, jurors took about a week to decide a patent case involving Google and Oracle. But in another patent dispute, a jury took only about an hour to award Monsanto a billion dollars. Whatever the jury decides in this case, the verdict is likely to be appealed.

Wendy Kaufman, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.