When the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union last month, the seaside town of Port Talbot in Wales eagerly went along with the move. Brexit was approved by some 57 percent of the town's residents.

Now some of them are wondering if they made the wrong decision.

The June 23 Brexit vote has raised questions about the fate of the troubled Port Talbot Works, Britain's largest surviving steel plant — a huge, steam-belching facility that has long been the town's biggest employer.

Solar Impulse 2 has landed in Cairo, completing the penultimate leg of its attempt to circumnavigate the globe using only the power of the sun.

The trip over the Mediterranean included a breathtaking flyover of the Pyramids. Check it out:

President Obama is challenging Americans to have an honest and open-hearted conversation about race and law enforcement. But even as he sits down at the White House with police and civil rights activists, Obama is mindful of the limits of that approach.

"I've seen how inadequate words can be in bringing about lasting change," the president said Tuesday at a memorial service for five law officers killed last week in Dallas. "I've seen how inadequate my own words have been."

Mice watching Orson Welles movies may help scientists explain human consciousness.

At least that's one premise of the Allen Brain Observatory, which launched Wednesday and lets anyone with an Internet connection study a mouse brain as it responds to visual information.

The FBI says it is giving up on the D.B. Cooper investigation, 45 years after the mysterious hijacker parachuted into the night with $200,000 in a briefcase, becoming an instant folk figure.

"Following one of the longest and most exhaustive investigations in our history," the FBI's Ayn Dietrich-Williams said in a statement, "the FBI redirected resources allocated to the D.B. Cooper case in order to focus on other investigative priorities."

This is the first in a series of essays concerning our collective future. The goal is to bring forth some of the main issues humanity faces today, as we move forward to uncertain times. In an effort to be as thorough as possible, we will consider two kinds of threats: those due to natural disasters and those that are man-made. The idea is to expose some of the dangers and possible mechanisms that have been proposed to deal with these issues. My intention is not to offer a detailed analysis for each threat — but to invite reflection and, hopefully, action.

Alabama authorities say a home burglary suspect has died after police used a stun gun on the man.  Birmingham police say he resisted officers who found him in a house wrapped in what looked like material from the air conditioner duct work.  The Lewisburg Road homeowner called police Tuesday about glass breaking and someone yelling and growling in his basement.  Police reportedly entered the dwelling and used a stun gun several times on a white suspect before handcuffing him.  Investigators say the man was "extremely irritated" throughout and didn't obey verbal commands.

It can be hard to distinguish among the men wearing grey suits and regulation haircuts on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington. But David Margolis always brought a splash of color.

It wasn't his lovably disheveled wardrobe, or his Elvis ring, but something else: the force of his flamboyant personality. Margolis, a graduate of Harvard Law School, didn't want to fit in with the crowd. He wanted to stand out.

Montgomery Education Foundation's Brain Forest Summer Learning Academy was spotlighted Wednesday at Carver High School.  The academic-enrichment program is for rising 4th, 5th, and 6th graders in the Montgomery Public School system.  Community Program Director Dillion Nettles, says the program aims to prevent learning loss during summer months.  To find out how your child can participate in next summer's program visit Montgomery-ed.org

A police officer is free on bond after being arrested following a rash of road-sign thefts in southeast Alabama.  Brantley Police Chief Titus Averett says officer Jeremy Ray Walker of Glenwood is on paid leave following his arrest in Pike County.  The 30-year-old Walker is charged with receiving stolen property.  Lt. Troy Johnson of the Pike County Sheriff's Office says an investigation began after someone reported that Walker was selling road signs from Crenshaw County.  Investigators contacted the county engineer and learned signs had been reported stolen from several roads.

Pages

The (Huge And Rarely Discussed) Health Insurance Tax Break

Dec 4, 2012
Originally published on December 5, 2012 9:56 am

What's the largest tax break in the federal tax code?

If you said the mortgage interest deduction, you'd be wrong. The break for charitable giving? Nope. How about capital gains, or state and local taxes? No, and no.

Believe it or not, dollar for dollar, the most tax revenue the federal government forgoes every year is from not taxing the value of health insurance that employers provide their workers.

Yet most people don't even realize that they don't pay taxes on the value of those health benefits. That's too bad, says MIT health economist Jonathan Gruber, because it represents a whole lot of money.

"If we treated health insurance the same way we treat wages," says Gruber, "we would raise about $250 billion per year more." That not only makes the health insurance exclusion the federal government's largest tax break, but it's also "the third largest health care program in the U.S., after Medicare and Medicaid."

And just how much does $250 billion represent in health care terms? "If we ended the tax exclusion, we could cover every uninsured American with health insurance twice over," Gruber estimates.

But there's another thing about the health care deduction that's kind of surprising: It came about largely by accident.

"It was just a way to allow employers to evade the wage and price controls of World War II," says Gruber. "And it's sort of grown exponentially since, and there really isn't a single health care expert who would design a system from scratch which would include this feature."

One big reason economists from across the ideological spectrum don't much like the insurance tax exclusion is that it's regressive. That means those it helps the most are the richest people with the most generous health plans.

"So if you're uninsured, you get nothing," says Ron Pollack of the consumer group Families USA. "If you're a low-wage worker, you get a very little tax break. If you get a lousy health care plan you get a very little break out of this."

And giving people a tax break encourages them to consume their compensation in the form of health benefits rather than wages, says Gruber. In other words, it's a discount on health insurance. Which leads to other bad things, like health care inflation.

"People are buying health insurance with 60-cent dollars," he says. "And as a result, they're buying too much of it. They're buying too much health insurance, and that leads to too much health care consumption."

So why hasn't the exclusion been taken away? One large and obvious reason is that it would be seen by those who benefit from it as a tax increase. And not all of those people are rich.

"A large amount of this tax money would come right out of the pockets of working families," says Tom Leibfried of the AFL-CIO. "The [U.S. House] Ways and Means Committee staff looked at where the tax benefit goes for this tax break. Eighty-one percent of it goes to families making less than $200,000 a year."

But the biggest concern, particularly in light of the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, is that taking away the tax break would prompt employers to stop offering coverage. And that would push more people to new health care exchanges that will just be starting to find their footing.

"This is a very delicate moment in the history of our health care system," says Jim Klein, president of the American Benefits Council, which represents large employers. "And to now, in addition to all the other change, make changes to the tax treatment of employer-provided health care, would seem to be very risky."

The federal health law actually does begin to make some changes to the tax treatment of health insurance. It imposes a so-called Cadillac tax on very generous health plans, starting in 2018. Many people think that given the money involved, however, that tax could be expanded and sped up as part of the current negotiations.

Copyright 2012 National Public Radio. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

The largest tax break out there is one of the least talked about. That might be about to change. As part of our look into the debate over the federal budget and tax policy, NPR's Julie Rovner introduces us to the tax exclusion for employer-provided health insurance.

JULIE ROVNER, BYLINE: Most people don't even realize that they don't pay taxes on the value of the health insurance they get from their employer. That's too bad, says MIT health economist Jonathan Gruber, because it represents a whole lot of money. Just what would happen if all those health benefits were treated the same as wages for federal tax purposes?

JONATHAN GRUBER: We would raise about $250 billion per year more.

ROVNER: Or, he says, to put it another way...

GRUBER: If we ended the tax exclusion, we could cover every uninsured American with health insurance twice over.

ROVNER: That makes the health insurance tax break bigger than the home mortgage deduction, bigger than the charitable deduction and bigger than the deduction for capital gains, or state and local taxes. There's another thing about the health care exclusion that's kind of surprising. It happened largely by accident. Tom Leibfried is a legislative representative with the AFL-CIO.

TOM LEIBFRIED: Economists uniformly agree that we have employer-based coverage in this country. Two-thirds of everyone who has health insurance has it through an employer, and that's because this tax benefit has existed since World War II.

ROVNER: More specifically, says economist Gruber, it happened because employees started giving their workers health insurance because wage and price controls during World War II prevented them from giving cash wage raises.

GRUBER: And it's sort of grown exponentially since, and there really isn't a single health care expert who would design a system from scratch which would include this feature.

ROVNER: One big reason economists from across the ideological spectrum don't like the insurance tax exclusion much is that it's regressive. That means those it helps the most are the richest people with the most generous health plans, says Ron Pollack of the consumer group Families USA.

RON POLLACK: So if you're uninsured, you get nothing. If you're a low-wage worker, you get a very little tax break. If you get a lousy health care plan, you get a very little break out of this.

ROVNER: And giving people a tax break encourages them to take their compensation in the form of health benefits rather than wages, says Gruber. In other words, it's a discount on health insurance, which he says leads to other bad things, like health care inflation.

GRUBER: People are buying health insurance with 60-cent dollars. And as a result, they're buying too much of it. They're buying too much health insurance, and that leads to too much health care consumption.

ROVNER: So why hasn't the exclusion been taken away long since? One large and obvious reason is that it would be seen by those who benefit from it as a tax increase, and those are not only rich people, says the AFL-CIO's Leibfried.

LEIBFRIED: A large amount of this money would come right out of the pockets of working families. The Ways and Means Committee staff looked at where the tax benefit goes for this tax break. Eighty-one percent of it goes to families making less than $200,000 a year.

ROVNER: But the biggest concern - particularly in light of the implementation of the Affordable Care Act - is that taking away the tax break would prompt employers to stop offering coverage. And that would push more people to new health care exchanges that will just be starting to find their footing, says Jim Klein. He heads the American Benefits Council, which represents large employers.

JIM KLEIN: This is a very delicate moment in the history of our health care system. And to now, in addition to all the other changes, to make changes to the tax treatment of employer-provided health care, would seem to be very risky.

ROVNER: The federal health law actually does begin to make some changes to the tax treatment of health insurance. It imposes a so-called Cadillac tax on very generous health plans starting in the year 2018. Many people think that given the money involved, however, that tax could be expanded and sped up as part of the current negotiations. Julie Rovner, NPR News, Washington.

GREENE: And on ALL THINGS CONSIDERED later today, the politics of taking on the health care tax break. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright National Public Radio.