When the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union last month, the seaside town of Port Talbot in Wales eagerly went along with the move. Brexit was approved by some 57 percent of the town's residents.

Now some of them are wondering if they made the wrong decision.

The June 23 Brexit vote has raised questions about the fate of the troubled Port Talbot Works, Britain's largest surviving steel plant — a huge, steam-belching facility that has long been the town's biggest employer.

Solar Impulse 2 has landed in Cairo, completing the penultimate leg of its attempt to circumnavigate the globe using only the power of the sun.

The trip over the Mediterranean included a breathtaking flyover of the Pyramids. Check it out:

President Obama is challenging Americans to have an honest and open-hearted conversation about race and law enforcement. But even as he sits down at the White House with police and civil rights activists, Obama is mindful of the limits of that approach.

"I've seen how inadequate words can be in bringing about lasting change," the president said Tuesday at a memorial service for five law officers killed last week in Dallas. "I've seen how inadequate my own words have been."

Mice watching Orson Welles movies may help scientists explain human consciousness.

At least that's one premise of the Allen Brain Observatory, which launched Wednesday and lets anyone with an Internet connection study a mouse brain as it responds to visual information.

The FBI says it is giving up on the D.B. Cooper investigation, 45 years after the mysterious hijacker parachuted into the night with $200,000 in a briefcase, becoming an instant folk figure.

"Following one of the longest and most exhaustive investigations in our history," the FBI's Ayn Dietrich-Williams said in a statement, "the FBI redirected resources allocated to the D.B. Cooper case in order to focus on other investigative priorities."

This is the first in a series of essays concerning our collective future. The goal is to bring forth some of the main issues humanity faces today, as we move forward to uncertain times. In an effort to be as thorough as possible, we will consider two kinds of threats: those due to natural disasters and those that are man-made. The idea is to expose some of the dangers and possible mechanisms that have been proposed to deal with these issues. My intention is not to offer a detailed analysis for each threat — but to invite reflection and, hopefully, action.

Alabama authorities say a home burglary suspect has died after police used a stun gun on the man.  Birmingham police say he resisted officers who found him in a house wrapped in what looked like material from the air conditioner duct work.  The Lewisburg Road homeowner called police Tuesday about glass breaking and someone yelling and growling in his basement.  Police reportedly entered the dwelling and used a stun gun several times on a white suspect before handcuffing him.  Investigators say the man was "extremely irritated" throughout and didn't obey verbal commands.

It can be hard to distinguish among the men wearing grey suits and regulation haircuts on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington. But David Margolis always brought a splash of color.

It wasn't his lovably disheveled wardrobe, or his Elvis ring, but something else: the force of his flamboyant personality. Margolis, a graduate of Harvard Law School, didn't want to fit in with the crowd. He wanted to stand out.

Montgomery Education Foundation's Brain Forest Summer Learning Academy was spotlighted Wednesday at Carver High School.  The academic-enrichment program is for rising 4th, 5th, and 6th graders in the Montgomery Public School system.  Community Program Director Dillion Nettles, says the program aims to prevent learning loss during summer months.  To find out how your child can participate in next summer's program visit Montgomery-ed.org

A police officer is free on bond after being arrested following a rash of road-sign thefts in southeast Alabama.  Brantley Police Chief Titus Averett says officer Jeremy Ray Walker of Glenwood is on paid leave following his arrest in Pike County.  The 30-year-old Walker is charged with receiving stolen property.  Lt. Troy Johnson of the Pike County Sheriff's Office says an investigation began after someone reported that Walker was selling road signs from Crenshaw County.  Investigators contacted the county engineer and learned signs had been reported stolen from several roads.

Pages

Conservatives Invoke NAACP Case In Fight For Secret Donors

Dec 30, 2012
Originally published on December 30, 2012 9:27 pm

Here's a question: What do Republican strategist Karl Rove and civil rights icon Rosa Parks have in common?

The answer: a landmark Supreme Court ruling from 1958 protecting the First Amendment rights of dissident groups.

The case is rooted in the Montgomery bus boycott initiated by Parks in 1955. And it's likely to loom large in 2013 as Rove and other conservatives demand continued secrecy for the new class of million-dollar political donors.

A Wave Of Secret Money

This election year, secret money played a bigger role than in any other presidential campaign since Richard Nixon's. The nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation says secretly funded groups spent well over $200 million. And four-fifths of it helped Republicans.

So it's not surprising that conservatives want to keep donors' identities secret. They say it's essential to safeguard donors from harassment and intimidation.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky once favored sweeping transparency for political money. Not anymore.

In a major speech this year, he brought up the plight of a million-dollar donor to a superPAC supporting Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

"People were digging through his divorce records, cable television hosts were going after him on the air, and bloggers were harassing his kids," McConnell said.

'Intimidation And Harassment'

Rove, whose group Crossroads GPS was a leader in the secret fundraising, says disclosure advocates have a hidden agenda.

"They want to intimidate people into not giving to ... these conservative efforts," he said on Fox News.

And here is where Rove and Parks cross paths: In defending secret money, Rove invokes that Supreme Court case, NAACP v. Alabama. He lines up Crossroads GPS on the same side as Parks and the NAACP, and he says the transparency advocates make the same argument as the segregationists.

"I think it's shameful," Rove said. "I think it's a sign of their fear of democracy. And it's interesting that they have antecedents, and the antecedents are a bunch of segregationist attorney generals trying to shut down the NAACP."

To elaborate on this argument, aides to Rove recommended Heritage Foundation legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky.

"You look at the kind of intimidation and harassment that has occurred in the past year or two towards conservative political donors, and it makes you realize that the Supreme Court got it right," von Spakovsky says.

A 'False Symmetry'?

But the question is whether the two situations are similar.

A few months after the bus boycott began, Parks told Pacifica Radio how she had refused to give up her seat on the bus: "The time had just come when I had been pushed as far as I could stand to be pushed, I suppose," she said. "They placed me under arrest."

That was just the beginning. As the boycott grew, Montgomery law enforcement brought charges against Martin Luther King Jr. and other leaders. Arsonists firebombed their homes and churches. Across the state, rioters blocked an NAACP bid to desegregate the University of Alabama. A mob chased the one African-American student, chanting, "Let's kill her."

The university acted. It suspended the black student — and then expelled her.

Meanwhile, state Attorney General John Patterson subpoenaed the NAACP's membership records in Alabama. "The NAACP is the biggest enemy that the people of this state have," he said.

When the case finally reached the Supreme Court, the justices ruled in favor of the NAACP. They said the group faced attacks — both from government officials and from law-breakers — and that revealing its members would endanger their First Amendment rights.

"One of the reasons why the NAACP required special protections at that time [is] they were a minority group that law enforcement couldn't or wouldn't protect," says Dale Ho, a lawyer at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

He says conservatives are creating a "false symmetry" between those civil rights activists and today's millionaire donors. "In none of these recent cases that I'm aware of in the past five years has anyone ever alleged that law enforcement couldn't protect them adequately," Ho says.

A Right To Secrecy?

At the University of Chicago Law School, constitutional scholar Geoffrey Stone scoffs at the conservative argument, calling its proponents "a bunch of overly sensitive, thin-skinned billionaires who want to be able to have profound influence on the political process without being in any way accountable."

In the years since the NAACP v. Alabama decision, courts have never extended it to cover donors in the usual conservative-liberal, Republican-Democratic debates.

A related case did go to the Supreme Court in 2010. Challenging a state disclosure law, it sought to withhold the names of people who had petitioned against gay marriage.

The court said they had no right to secrecy. Justice Antonin Scalia was scathing: "Running a democracy takes a certain amount of civic courage. And the First Amendment does not protect you from criticism or even nasty phone calls."

But von Spakovsky says politically generous billionaires today need protection, just like civil rights workers 60 years ago.

"I don't think that a constitutional right like freedom of association should depend on how much money you have," he says.

It's an argument that seems sure to stir passionate debate this coming year as the disclosure battles take shape in Congress and the courts.

Copyright 2014 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

LINDA WERTHEIMER, HOST:

Here's a question: What do Republican strategist Karl Rove and Civil Rights icon Rosa Parks have in common. The answer is: A landmark Supreme Court ruling from 1958 protecting the First Amendment rights of dissident groups. The case is rooted in the Montgomery bus boycott initiated by Parks in 1955. And it's likely to loom large in 2013 for the new class of million-dollar political donors.

NPR's Peter Overby reports.

PETER OVERBY, BYLINE: This election year, secret money played a bigger role than in any other presidential campaign since Richard Nixon's. The nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation says that secretly funded groups spent well over $200 million, four-fifths of it helped Republicans. So it's not surprising that conservatives want to keep donors' identities secret. They say it's essential to safeguard donors from harassment and intimidation.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell once favored sweeping transparency for political money - not anymore. In a major speech this year, he brought up the plight of a million-dollar donor to a superPAC supporting Mitt Romney.

SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL: People were digging through his divorce records, cable television hosts were going after him on the air, and bloggers were harassing his kids.

OVERBY: Karl Rove's group, Crossroads GPS, was a leader in the secret fundraising. He said on Fox News that the disclosure advocates have a hidden agenda.

KARL ROVE: They want to intimidate people into not giving to these conservative efforts.

OVERBY: And here is where Karl Rove and Parks cross paths. In defending secret money, Rove invokes that Supreme Court case, NAACP versus Alabama. He lines up Crossroads GPS on the same side as Rosa Parks and the NAACP. And he says the transparency advocates are no different than the segregationists.

ROVE: I think it's shameful. I think it's a sign of their fear of democracy. And it's interesting that they have antecedents, and the antecedents are a bunch of segregationist attorney generals trying to shut down the NAACP.

OVERBY: To elaborate on this argument, aides to Rove recommended Heritage Foundation legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky.

HANS VON SPAKOVSKY: You look at the kind of intimidation and harassment that has occurred in the past year or two, towards conservative political donors and it makes you realize that the Supreme Court got it right.

OVERBY: But the question is whether the two situations are similar.

ROSA PARKS: The time had just come when I had been pushed as far as I could stand to be pushed, I suppose.

OVERBY: This is Rosa Parks a few months after the bus boycott began, telling Pacifica Radio how she had refused to give up her seat on the bus.

PARKS: They placed me under arrest.

OVERBY: As the boycott grew, Montgomery law enforcement brought charges against Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and other leaders and arsonists firebombed their homes and churches. Across the state, rioters blocked an NAACP bid to desegregate the University of Alabama. A mob chased the one African-American student, chanting: Let's kill her.

The university acted. It suspended the black student and then expelled her.

Meanwhile, state Attorney General John Patterson subpoenaed the NAACP's records of its members in Alabama.

JOHN PATTERSON: The NAACP is the biggest enemy that the people of this state have.

OVERBY: When the case finally reached the Supreme Court, the justices ruled in favor of the NAACP. They said the group faced attacks both from government officials and from lawbreakers, and that revealing its members would endanger their First Amendment rights.

DALE HO: One of the reasons why the NAACP required special protections at that time, they were a minority group that law enforcement couldn't or wouldn't protect.

OVERBY: Dale Ho is a lawyer at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. He says conservatives are creating a false symmetry between those civil rights activists and today's millionaire donors.

HO: In none of these recent cases that I'm aware of in the past five years has anyone ever alleged that law enforcement couldn't protect them adequately.

OVERBY: At the University of Chicago Law School, constitutional scholar Geoffrey Stone scoffs at the conservative argument.

GEOFFREY STONE: They're a bunch of overly sensitive, thin-skinned billionaires who want to be able to have profound influence on the political process without being in any way accountable.

OVERBY: In the years since the NAACP versus Alabama decision, courts have never extended it to cover donors in the usual conservative-liberal, Republican-Democratic debates.

A related case did go to the Supreme Court in 2010. Challenging a state disclosure law, it sought to withhold the names of people who had petitioned against gay marriage. The court said they had no right to secrecy. Justice Antonin Scalia was scathing.

JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA: Running a democracy takes a certain amount of civic courage. And the First Amendment does not protect you from criticism, or even nasty phone calls.

OVERBY: But von Spakovsky says that politically generous billionaires nowadays need protection, just like civil rights workers 60 years ago.

SPAKOVSKY: I don't think that a constitutional right, like Freedom of Association, should depend on how much money you have.

OVERBY: It's an argument that seems sure to stir passionate debate this coming year as the disclosure battles take shape in Congress and the courts.

Peter Overby NPR News, Washington. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.